<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>CloudWatch on The David Page</title><link>https://thedavidpage.pages.dev/tags/cloudwatch/</link><description>Recent content in CloudWatch on The David Page</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 09:00:00 +0700</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://thedavidpage.pages.dev/tags/cloudwatch/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>HTTP 429 When Calling the Gemini API on AWS</title><link>https://thedavidpage.pages.dev/posts/cloud/aws/ec2/http-429-gemini-api-on-aws/</link><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 09:00:00 +0700</pubDate><guid>https://thedavidpage.pages.dev/posts/cloud/aws/ec2/http-429-gemini-api-on-aws/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Running into HTTP 429 calling the Gemini API on AWS — and how our team fixed it.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hi everyone 👋&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While building our capstone project (a RAG chatbot running on EC2 that calls the Gemini API), we hit an error that anyone who&amp;rsquo;s integrated a third-party API has probably run into at least once: &lt;strong&gt;HTTP 429 – Too Many Requests&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At first we were pretty confused, because everything ran fine locally — no signs of trouble at all. But the moment we deployed to EC2 and tested with multiple concurrent users, requests piled up and Gemini politely declined with a 429.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>When RDS Proxy Eats 70% of Your Total CloudWatch Ingestion Cost</title><link>https://thedavidpage.pages.dev/posts/cloud/aws/rds/rds-proxy-cloudwatch-log-cost/</link><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 09:00:00 +0700</pubDate><guid>https://thedavidpage.pages.dev/posts/cloud/aws/rds/rds-proxy-cloudwatch-log-cost/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Pulling up a client&amp;rsquo;s Cost Explorer, I found RDS Proxy responsible for 70% of their total CloudWatch Logs ingestion cost — while their actual &amp;ldquo;RDS Proxy&amp;rdquo; line item looked completely normal.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hi everyone 👋&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My first reaction, and the first reaction of nearly every client I&amp;rsquo;ve shown this number to, is always the same: &lt;em&gt;&amp;ldquo;I&amp;rsquo;m already paying for RDS Proxy by the vCPU-hour — why is it also eating into my CloudWatch bill? Aren&amp;rsquo;t those two completely separate things?&amp;rdquo;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>That CloudWatch Logs Insights Query Just Cost You $2.50</title><link>https://thedavidpage.pages.dev/posts/cloud/aws/cloudwatch/cloudwatch-logs-insights-expensive-queries/</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 09:00:00 +0700</pubDate><guid>https://thedavidpage.pages.dev/posts/cloud/aws/cloudwatch/cloudwatch-logs-insights-expensive-queries/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;One click on CloudWatch Logs Insights, a few seconds waiting for results — and a bill for scanning half a terabyte of logs.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hi everyone 👋&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CloudWatch Logs Insights is a genuinely convenient SQL-like log query tool. The way AWS bills for it, though, catches a lot of people off guard.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="-the-common-mistake"&gt;😱 The common mistake&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Open Logs Insights, pick a log group that&amp;rsquo;s accumulated 6 months of logs (~500 GB), type a broad search query with no explicit time range set, hit &lt;strong&gt;Run&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>